April, 2009

...now browsing by month

 

Red Mountain Theatre Company: Sweeney Todd

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Dan Uggla is a second baseman for the Florida Marlins.  He is normally an outstanding baseball player.  Uggla is partially famous, though, for his poor showing in the 2008 Major League Baseball All-Star Game, where he made a record three errors and struck out three times.  If you’re not a baseball fan, I can tell you that’s an embarrassing night.  Even after that misery, his team will pay him more than five million dollars in 2009.

Ozzie Smith was possibly the best defensive shortstop in the history of baseball.  Smith – also known affectionately as the Wizard – still made 281 errors during his long career, no doubt disapointing at least one starry-eyed kid at the ballpark on each of those days.  Moreover, Rick Ankiel currently plays outfield for the St. Louis Cardinals, but he’s primarily famous for three appearances – in his former role as a pitcher – in the 2000 playoffs.  It was over this stretch that Ankiel unexpectedly and completely lost control of his pitching arm, walking four batters and throwing an incredible five wild pitches in a single inning.  If you don’t know, it all worked out; Ankiel is set to make almost a three million dollar salary in 2009.

Which leads me to the Red Mountain Theatre Company’s production of Sweeney Todd.  During the show, I’d written at least three times in my notes about the excellence of Tam DeBolt as Mrs. Lovett.  For example, I wrote “legitimately good and funny” and “funny and creepy all at once” and “Lovett has these great ‘crazy eyes’ . . . her with Todd are always good scenes”.  Then, without warning, she may have made the theatrical equivalent of three errors in a single ballgame.

During a scene alone onstage with seventh grader Austin Russell, there was a slight pause.  I may have witnessed the flash of real terror in Russell’s eyes before DeBolt quietly exclaimed something like, “I’m dumb,” and then interrupted the performance to ask the notably excellent live musicians if they could go back.  After a short off-script discussion between the front and back of the stage, there was a legitimately genteel and touching moment where she revealed to the audience – and reassured Russell with a jaunty bop on his nose – that the mistake was her fault and that she’d given him a misplaced cue.

I’m sympathetic because I’ve been there.  If I close my eyes, I can recall the high-geared, whirring terror I experienced on the high school stage when the girl across from me couldn’t deliver her next line.  But whatever that show was didn’t involve the added difficulties of live music, singing, Sondheim, and working with a seventh-grader.  I can just imagine a professional’s thought-process – all in a split-second: Did I?  Yes, I did.  Oh!  No!  What’s he doing?  Does he know?  Can I fix it?  Will he fix it?  Can I talk over it?  Around it?  Should I stop him?  Stop it?  No, don’t stop the show.  But…  But…  Damn.

Unless somehow typical, the point here shouldn’t be her mistake.  The road to genius can be like a cruel game of Chutes and Ladders – rife with uncomfortable ways to slip down to merely “human”.  If you don’t play, you can’t ever mess up or embarrass yourself.  That’s true.  But you’ll never be granted an opportunity to win over an audience.  Even if you can only squeeze in four-fifths of a superlative performance before that fragile spell gets broken, that’s far better than most.  DeBolt’s long acting biography speaks for itself: “recently seen on the RMTC stage as “Florence” in the female version of The Odd Couple. . . . Beauty and the Beast (Mrs. Potts), Tinyard Hill (Aunt May), CHICAGO (Mama Morton), Song & Dance (Emma), BAT BOY – The Musical (Mayor Maggie) and Gypsy (Mama Rose). . . . Regional theatre credits: Steel Magnolias (M’Lynn), Falsettos (Dr. Charlotte) and The Music Man (Mrs. Paroo).”

A lesson to be learned from an unlikely source: “Although the night went the way it did, I had a blast,” Uggla said. “You don’t try and justify anything, it is what it is.  My reputation is what it is.  One night isn’t going to change it.  I made some errors, and I’ll make some more.”  Play ‘em one day at a time, Dan.

Along with Tam DeBolt, the other standout actor was David Coker in the difficult role of Judge Turpin.  Coker – with an intentionally twisted and contorted face throughout – somehow conveyed the chilling creepiness of the judge while still keeping him partially sympathetic.  No mean feat.  The “Pretty Women” duet between the judge and Sweeney Todd plays as serious fun.

On the other hand, this duet, and in fact the whole performance, would be better if all the on-stage murders had been more gruesome and dramatic.  Sweeney Todd is about murder and cannibalism.  There’s a vibrant bloodsplash across all of the marketing materials.  Everything foreshadows this violence.  There’s a rape in front of the audience.  The body count approaches ten.  The words throughout are bleak: There’s a hole in the world / Like a great black pit / And the vermin of the world / Inhabit it / And its morals aren’t worth / What a pig could spit / And it goes by the name of London.”  Even the girls of the ensemble have heavy makeup bruising all over their arms.  It’s supposed to be realistic and gritty.  This is a dark ride.

Someone has decided, however, to reduce the killing to a quick, bloodless, and screamless slash of Sweeney’s razor.  There were three blonde girls in the front row, age ten or so, who weren’t even paying attention as Sweeney committed his murders.  Instead, they often were distracted by something else.  I obviously was, too.  If you’re going to pick Sweeney Todd as a project, it may be a disservice to Abe Reybold, playing the lead, to rob him of his primary opportunity to show the brutality of his character.  I’ll never forget seeing King Lear at the Alabama Shakespeare Festival and wincing in sympathy as Gloucester’s eyes were gouged out on stage while he howled and twitched in pain.  It’ll stay with me forever.  Violence in the theatre is not like violence on a movie screen.  You feel it more because it’s right in front of you.  It’s this framework of gritty violence that drives this show.  It should be riveting.

Thanks very much to Nicole Smith and the rest of the Red Mountain Theatre Company for inviting me to see the performance.

Scanwiches

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

It’s not a Birmingham thing so I won’t devote much space, but Scanwiches.com – combining pretty art and yummy, yummy sandwiches – is my favorite new thing on the internet.  For now.  Yeah, y’all know how that works.

Could I enlist a photographer’s help to run around town one weekend and take pictures of our local sandwiches?  No reason not to do it in Birmingham.

And now I’m hungry again.

Poetry: Swine Flu

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

Swine Flu

Swine flu is not a national crisis;
It is not an emergency;
Nor a catastrophe.
Unnamed flus kill a thousand people a week.

Like shark attacks,
Even these words won’t matter,
In a few short months.

I remember my mother,
Doing a credible voice when she cried out,
“Wolf! Wolf! The wolf is chasing the sheep!”
Teaching me about
Exaggeration and
False panics.

The real crisis is that
I no longer believe my mother:
People still tune in
Every day
All day
For reports
From the little shepherd boy.

What will he say next?

New Painting: Flowers

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

I finished a new painting.  It represents two days of work and it was the mini-canvases that more-or-less inspired this idea.  The last batch of the mini-canvases I worked on all used a green that I liked, so I appropriated a similar green here.

I’ve been wanting to paint a background similar to this for several years and had it in my head.  It starts with sharp, violent strokes up from the bottom of the canvas with darker greens.  Lighter greens are then added over the top with the same strokes – up and to each side.  Finally, the lightest green and whites are added, but proceeding in clumps down the canvas to cover the bottoms of earlier strokes with the tops of final strokes.  I painted the background while I watched The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, which I got from the Emmet O’Neal Library.

I liked the background, but I knew it eventually needed a foreground of some sort.  Before thinking about it too hard, I used simple white paint and loaded up my biggest brush and smashed it around in little circles.  Twisting it counter-clockwise into the canvas with an overload of paint.  I kept making more and more of these, thinking that they’d be flowers, eventually, but not really knowing where I was going.  I didn’t worry about whether they looked nice, pretty, or even like petals.

It’s difficult, I think, to create a “pattern” for the flowers.  In real life, flowers don’t grow randomly and they’re not evenly placed.  So I started clumping them and intentionally leaving some spaces between blooms.  I didn’t want it to look too “regular” or orderly.  But it needed to have some sort of cohesive force behind it.  When I figured it looked okay enough, I stopped.

I mixed a healthy amount of red and purple paint into a nice color and used a small brush to detail the surface of the big flower-blob things.  I tried my best not to disturb the shape of the blobs, instead focusing on painting the outside of the flower-shapes.  Some got more color than others – just like in real life.  And some are a little misshapen – just like in real life.

I wanted to leave it this way, just red and white flowers on a green background, but it didn’t look right.  I stared at it for several hours before getting the confidence to throw in some stems.  These green lines were surprisingly tricky to paint, but I think it gives some good texture and context to the foreground flowers.

It’s maybe the first painting I’ve done that looks really mainstream.  I keep telling people that I can imagine my grandmother wanting to hang it over her couch.  Which is a different feel for me, I think.  But I like it and will probably experiment with more in this vein in the near future.

Alabama Ballet: Re-post

Monday, April 27th, 2009

This article was originally published on April 3, but I’m reprinting it today because it was picked up by Peter DiMuro with Dance/Metro DC and republished as part of their National Dance Week festivities.  I’m glad to help – thank you!

***

I’m lucky enough to have a friend, Leslie Cooper, who works with the Alabama Ballet.  I’ve been pestering her for a while about watching a ballet practice, so she graciously set me up to watch the final dress rehearsal of the Ballet’s upcoming performance.  The show – running this weekend only – pairs Twyla Tharp’s Nine Sinatra Songs with award-winning resident choreographer Roger Van Fleteren’s new piece, Messin’ with Mozart.  After my preview, I recommend it.  (There’s also a fun-sounding special “Red Carpet Event” on Saturday night where a panel will give awards to attendees who are judged as the “Most Sophisticated, ” “Most Glamorous,” or “Most Innovative.”)  Some further information is available from Michael Huebner at this link.

For the record, I am not a particularly big dance enthusiast.  I was born and raised in the deep south, love college football, mostly prefer beer to wine, often don’t shave when I’m not required to, and use as few grooming products as I possibly can.  With the exception of an embarrassing breakdancing class my mother signed me up for as a kid, I have never danced in any formalized setting, my body looks nothing like a dancer’s, and I kind of feel like a cross between Michael Stipe and Chris Farley when I get on down with my bad self.  I admit that I’m completely unqualified to judge “good” dancing in any form.

Why did I feel compelled to write that last paragraph?  Because men aren’t supposed to like dance, that’s why, and there are people that’ll think it’s weird that I wanted to go to the ballet – by myself – and without having a pretty girl to dress up, hold hands with, and try to impress.  Why is that?  Even though I’m not a person that lives and breathes for the ballet, I do appreciate it and I’m almost always glad I made the effort to go.  So what exactly does a normally sports-watching man get out of going to a dance performance?  Here’s my list of what exactly I’m paying attention to when I get an opportunity to watch dance.

1. The Pretty Girls

Even though it’s among the finest of the fine arts, there’s no one forcing me to appreciate it solely on that level.  I’m unapologetic about watching it from a less-sophisticated viewpoint.  For the most part, dancers have spent years working on flexibility, strength, control, and grace.  They have beautiful, almost un-American bodies.  For performances, they fix up with pretty hair and pretty makeup.  Dance outfits are notoriously revealing and the ballet, in particular, puts a premium on showing off all those spectacular legs.  Maybe most importantly, you’re supposed to watch.  A big part of the fun in watching television and movies is that they remove the social stigma in staring, because the actors can’t catch you and they won’t think you’re being rude.  The same is true of dance, concerts, and the theater.  How often do you get a chance to really watch, linger over, and appreciate someone attractive without a lurking fear of being “caught”?  I honestly don’t know why more men don’t go to the ballet if just for this reason alone.

2. Falling in Love

Just like the ubiquitous drama masks, there are a few basic emotions that artists are trying to make you feel.  Comedy and tragedy of course.  But, unless they’re playing bad guys, every dancer wants you to fall in love with them.  If you don’t fall for someone up on stage – at least a little – then they simply haven’t done a good job.  When I go to performances, I always begin by watching everyone on the stage, but there’s almost always a favorite or two that draw my attention.  It’s different things with different dancers, just like meeting people in the real world, but I typically find someone that holds my attention during the rest of the performance.  During the dress rehearsal, I think it was Lily Ojea.  I have little concept of her skill level, technical mastery, concentration, or whether she’s mean to animals or kids in the real world, but she held my attention almost the whole time.  Je ne frickin’ sais quoi.  And that’s what’s supposed to happen, though it may be someone different every performance.  Find someone you like and watch them.  Allow yourself the simple joy of appreciating someone else’s performance.

3. It’s Fun, Right?

All the artistry and technical skill in the world might not matter – except to specialists – if it’s not fun.  I’d think this responsibility rests equally on the choreographer and the dancers.  If the steps aren’t fun, it’s hard for a dancer to have fun with it and, in turn, persuade the audience that it’s fun.  Transversely, if the most fun choreography in the world is given to boring people, then it can’t be fun for the audience.  A parallel I know much better is songwriting and singing.  If the song’s no good, it’s tough for any singer to make it sound decent.  But even the best song in the world can’t sound much good with a bad singer.

It’s fun to look for the fun.  Where did the choreographer add the playful touches?  Whether it’s one of the dancers chewing gum on stage; an intentionally stumbling, bumbling series of moves between a couple who can’t quite seem to get on the same page; or a gratuitous use of the “Junior Birdmen” goggles,  there should be a lot of mischief in a good piece.  Plus, much like individual singers, each dancer brings a unique, signature set of skills and talents to each move.  The little fingerprints of a dancer’s personality just can’t help but come out on a stage.  “Art is a wicked thing.  It is what we are.” I enjoy looking for each dancer’s strengths and trying to get an idea of why they’re an interesting person worth knowing and watching.  Dance must be at it’s best when the dancer’s strengths are matched precisely to the piece.

4. Pairing Up

It’s a natural human feeling upon seeing two people together to try and forge a connection in your head between those people.  I remember at least one photography exhibit where the artist took a series of black and white shots of paired up people.  Most of the people didn’t know one another, if I remember correctly, but seeing these people paired together for a picture, the audience couldn’t help but wonder.  Do they get along?  Do they like each other?  Would they like each other?  What do they have in common?  Do they come from the same place?

Put any two dancers together and the audience starts to wonder the same thing.  Do they like each other?  Are they similarly skilled?  Is one better than the other?  Are they frustrated with one another?  Do they speak the same language?  Does she like him more than he likes her?  Is it the other way around?  There’s often a couple at any dance that looks like they can barely stand to touch one another.  And there’s often that couple that looks like they’re on a honeymoon.  It’s a fun game to try and pick up on the social clues.

5. Visible and Invisible Difficulty

I’ve had this same discussion with both Leslie and another of my friends, who is a dancer and dance critic.  It’s easy to miss how difficult dance is, because the dancers are making it look so easy.

When an NFL defensive end forces his way around (or through) an offensive lineman to sack a quarterback, I have some intrinsic knowledge of how hard that is to do.  When Chipper Jones hits a 12-to-6 curveball out of the park for an opposite field home run, I know exactly how hard that is.  When LeBron dribbles around the defender and dunks, I know I can’t possibly do it.  But you can often see the stress of competition and physical exertion on their faces.  The difficulty of performing at that level is obvious.

Dancers, however, put on their best smiles even as they’re stretching and punishing their bodies.  It’s an important element of the craft to try and hide just how difficult it all is.  No matter how many bruises, bumps, strains, and sprains a particular move has caused oh-so-many times in practice, you’ve still got to go out there and make it seem effortlessSmile and look pretty.

For men who are used to watching sports, I think it’s difficult to get over this flip-flop in emphasis.  Dancers are hiding the ball in a way that other athletes do not.  It’s part of the reason I like going to dance practice, as opposed to shows, and to any dance event that allows me to get up close and personal with the clopping, huffing, and sweating.  What they’re doing can be incredibly difficult.  One good way of watching and enjoying a dance performance is just to pick out all the things that look easy, but really aren’t, even if it’s just a specific turn of an ankle or a quietly, gracefully held position.  In the same way that I could never dunk a basketball, I could never do ballet.

For the casual fan, however, appreciation of the stress and difficulty itself probably can’t eclipse appreciation of the personalities which are expressed through the rigors of dancing.  For me, dance is a means to an end.  It chooses an interesting person with an artistic sensibility and asks that person to sculpt their body through intensive practice.  It observes that person’s individual skills and makeup and then prepares an activity which will stretch those talents and the confidence in being able to complete it on stage, in front of people, and while making it look effortless.  It’s under this sort of strain – complete with wobbles, slips, and winces – that artistry and character may be ideally expressed and exposed.

Final Score for the Alabama Ballet:  Pretty people?  Yes.  Did I fall a little?  Yes.  Was it fun?  Yes.  Dancer personalities?  Yes.  Difficulty?  I sure think so….