Miscellaneous

...now browsing by category

 

Armistice Day

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

From the 1973 Breakfast of Champions by Kurt Vonnegut:

“I will come to a time in my backwards trip when November eleventh, accidentally my birthday, was a sacred day called Armistice Day.  When I was a boy . . . all the people of all the nations which had fought in the First World War were silent during the eleventh minute of the eleventh hour of Armistice Day, which was the eleventh day of the eleventh month.

“It was during that minute in nineteen hundred and eighteen, that millions upon millions of human beings stopped butchering one another.  I have talked to old men who were on battlefields during that minute.  They have told me in one way or another that the sudden silence was the Voice of God. So we still have among us some men who can remember when God spoke clearly to mankind.

“Armistice Day has become Veterans’ Day.  Armistice Day was sacred. Veterans’ day is not.

“So I will throw Veterans’ Day over my shoulder.  Armistice Day I will keep.  I don’t want to throw away any sacred things.”

Washington Post: Leaps and Bounds

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

I didn’t write this, someone named Sarah Kaufman did, but it’s a very cool dance/football article from the September 20, 2009, issue of the Washington Post.  It relates to other stuff I’ve written about dance on this blog, so I thought I’d reprint the first part and link you to go see the rest.

***
Leaps and Bounds – Gridiron Grace Shares Much With the Ultimate Source of Fancy Footwork: Dance

By Sarah Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, September 20, 2009

To other sports belongs the poetry.  Football has none of baseball’s tranquillity and patience, and unlike boxing or tennis, it’s not a sport of studious, calculating loners.  It doesn’t have soccer’s fluidity, or basketball’s popcorn aerials.  Football lurches and galumphs; it traffics in confusion, time pressure and pileup after brutal pileup.

And yet, though football may be the closest thing to a gladiatorial spectacle since the fall of Rome, it can also claim kinship with the slippered heroes of the ballet stage.

True, its players are the sports equivalent of Hummers — overbuilt and overbulgy, their pads and helmets inflating them beyond human scale.  Their uniforms don’t enhance the male physique, they objectify it: table-top shoulders, bowling-ball head, lumpy thighs like sacks of feed.

But in the players’ finest moments, elegance often exists alongside the brutality.  And no wonder: Few sports have more in common with the formality and artistry of a dance performance.

Consider the structure.  At center stage, in the spotlight, is the star — the quarterback, stepping away from the linemen (a corps de beefsteak that has its own ensemble work to do).  The quarterback’s solo, the few seconds it takes to mime a diversion and find his partner, makes up the first few beats of the team’s choreography, which has been scripted, rehearsed, cast with the best available performers.

As with all live theater, anything can happen, especially with a skilled defense trying to steal the show.  In the most artful finish — okay, so maybe it doesn’t eat up time as well as the running game, but we’re talking aesthetics here — our hero connects with a wide receiver, sending a whistling pass to a fleet Mercury who will rocket high with a half-spin and full extension, making the catch and keeping it inbounds by the tips of his exquisitely pointed toes.

That’s how the Pittsburgh Steelers’ Santonio Holmes made the game-winning touchdown in last season’s Super Bowl, his perfectly placed toes grabbing the spotlight with the control and finesse of a ballerina.  Ball secure up top, feet like daggers down below, Holmes didn’t need to look to find the hairbreadth between inbounds and out.

Then there’s Arizona Cardinals’ wide receiver Larry Fitzgerald, channeling a ballet prince in one game as he vaulted into the air and pirouetted to snatch the ball.  He landed, one-legged, in a deep plie; somehow reorganizing a stumble into forward motion, he whisked in for a touchdown.

Some players can be so creative on the field, they ought to consider a post-retirement life in the theater.  Take Baltimore Ravens defensive standout Ed Reed, a free safety whose acting ability is Oscar-worthy.  Time and again, his moves tell opposing quarterbacks the same story: La-dee-dah, I’m going over here, so it’s safe to throw the ball over there . . . and over and over, they fall for his fiction and toss him a big, fat interception.

It’s part fakery, part footwork.  With a dancer’s versatility, Reed shifts seamlessly from defense to offense — remember how he snagged a pass in the end zone and slipped into the role of a receiver in last year’s game against the Philadelphia Eagles?  His 107-yard return was a feat of elusiveness that the haughtiest ballerina would envy; linemen bore down on him like freight trains, but he danced away from hit after hit, slipping past would-be claimants like the ghost-virgin of “Giselle,” pivoting on those flexible ankles, skating by with a stride as long as it was fast.  Straight into the NFL record books.

Imagination and the ability to improvise are part of any performer’s arsenal, and it’s no different for wide receivers, whose success in catching a pass depends on rhythm and timing.  Sometimes, both have to be altered on the fly to suit the scenario.  There’s always the risk of an interloper, some meddling defensive back, getting in the way of the quarterback’s duet with the man he’s, um, longing for: Where is he?  Oh, where?  We were supposed to meet 25 yards out. . . .  Ah, found you at last!

“I feel like I should never be defined by how I should run a route,” says Redskins wide receiver Santana Moss.  “How I should run this play or how I should do this pattern. . . .  If I know I can put two patterns in one and I can get the same out of it, you gotta do that in a split second.  Improvising.”

“He has some special moves,” Redskins wide receivers coach Stan Hixon says.  “Some of the routes are Santana’s routes, and I’m trying to teach some of the other guys how to run that route.   And each guy can put his own little flavor to the route.”

Moss can be a temperamental star, as he proved when he got into a slugfest last week with Giants cornerback Corey Webster.  But his more refined attributes as a receiver make him stand out.  The 30-year-old Moss, according to his coaches, is in a class by himself, and it comes down to physical as well as mental agility.  A smallish player, he’s not among the new trend of power hitters in receiver positions — 6-footers like Terrell Owens and Chad Ochocinco, who are muscular and massive enough to break tackles without having to slip away from defenders like darting fish.  Playmakers, sure, but they do it without grace.  Moss, at 5-10 and scarcely 200 pounds, is something of a throwback among receivers.  He relies on fast footwork, agility, coordination — and mostly, he’s got the intuitive body awareness that the best dancers have.

“I look at it as being graceful on the grass,” says Moss.  “It’s an art form — the moves I make after I make my catch.  It’s almost like a ballet.”  He knows what he’s talking about.  Moss studied dance for four years while at the University of Miami, taking classes especially for athletes.  (No tights, he’s careful to point out. He danced in sweats.)  What he learned in the studio comes in especially handy, he says, when he’s coming back to earth after leaping for the ball.  “Guys land so hard, but I know how to control my weight.

“You got to be fluid, in a way.  Know how to get small in the space, know how not to crash out of bounds.  How to let my body fall.”

(more at this link to the original piece at the Washington Post)

Lockhart’s Lament

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

[T]here is nothing as dreamy and poetic, nothing as radical, subversive, and psychedelic, as mathematics….  Mathematics is the purest of the arts, as well as the most misunderstood.” -Paul Lockhart

Way back in school, I was probably classified as “good at math”.  But I distinctly remember – once I got to college – loudly protesting against embarking on a math-y career.  Between the ages of 18 and 21, I shifted from wanting to be a physics professor, to declaring myself an engineering major, to changing my major to philosophy.  I think in large part because of the warp in focus somewhere betwixt my mostly-excellent high school math classes and then my cattle-call math and engineering classes in college, they robbed all the fun out of mathematical problem-solving.  Math is, and should be, a creative process.

Many a graduate student has come to grief when they discover, after a decade of being told they were ‘good at math,’ that in fact they have no real mathematical talent and are just very good at following directions.  Math is not about following directions, it’s about making new directions.

My older brother, J-Dog, recently sent me a great article – Lockhart’s Lament – written by Paul Lockhart and republished by Keith Devlin of Stanford.  (More information about these people can be found here.)  It’s a piece on mathematics education which bemoans the way its’ teaching kills creativity.  This well-written article has many parallels to the arts, arts education, and creativity, so I can enthusiastically recommend it and try to re-link it for your enjoyment:

Read Lockhart’s Lament at this link.

How to Play Tichu

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

My friend, John Marc Green, called me early Friday morning and asked if I could help him with a project.  John Marc is a contract videographer.  He owns cool, high-tech video equipment.  He’s good at what he does.  I was sleepy, so I said yes.  I immediately wished I could take it back.

If doing art is supposed to scare the hell out of you a little, this did.  It’s the first time I can ever remember agreeing to be in front of a camera.  John Marc did all the production work; I’m just the actor.  My pay was some Friday Chicken from Taziki’s.  I don’t think I’m awful, but I’m still awfully uncomfortable watching myself on playback.  Enjoy.  Be kind.

How To Play Tichu from John Green on Vimeo.

Scanwiches

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

It’s not a Birmingham thing so I won’t devote much space, but Scanwiches.com – combining pretty art and yummy, yummy sandwiches – is my favorite new thing on the internet.  For now.  Yeah, y’all know how that works.

Could I enlist a photographer’s help to run around town one weekend and take pictures of our local sandwiches?  No reason not to do it in Birmingham.

And now I’m hungry again.