Music

...now browsing by category

 

The Leeds Arts Council Presents Oliver!

Friday, July 23rd, 2010

“Consider yourself – one of the family!”

This is community theatre at its most enthusiastic and rockwellian.  If you visited Leeds, Alabama, you’d be in a place that Charles Dickens probably would’ve never guessed that his London-centric novel, Oliver Twist, would’ve been turned into a musical and performed.  “Located one block past Regions Bank the last building on the left next to Carl Ann’s Florist.”  Yep, really.  I can only hope that Carl Ann likes kids.  And has a tight grip on any wallet or handkerchief.

I sometimes complain that there isn’t much community feel in Birmingham.  Even though one of my friends suggested that we’re “the biggest small town in America.”  And of course you can generate this kind of feeling from personal involvement in various different groups or organizations.  But I don’t know if you can find much “we’re all in this together” kind of spirit generally.

And I often wish I had a more cohesive family as well.  All the way up through my grandparents, we’re about as independent as you can get.  We like space.  Yes, I admit that I like mine a lot of the time.  I’ve had several running conversations with friends about how much distance we like in relationships – everybody’s got a different taste for it.  For example, I think my parents were supportive of my talents and the things I wanted to do, but I absolutely can’t contemplate my Mom and/or Dad acting with me in musical theatre.

So I couldn’t help but notice that the cast of Oliver! – as produced by the Leeds Arts Council – was a family affair.  There were five members of one family: Emily Lunsford (Bet), Lucy Lunsford (Charley Bates/Boy), Joseph Lunsford (Boy), Margarita Lunsford (Mrs. Bedwin), and Michael Lunsford (Mr. Sowerberry).  Direct from Emily: “Most of my family have been acting together since 2000 and it has been such fun!”

Holy cow, I can’t even seriously begin to imagine.

But I’ll admit to being more than a little jealous.  My family was always more “check in with me once a month, okay, or maybe we can talk next year sometime?”  As long as everyone was off somewhere happily doing their own thing, everything was fine.  As a little kid, I’m sure I would have loved acting with my parents.  Somewhere along the way, being onstage with them would’ve become about as uncool as anything gets.  But add a pinch of maturity, an ounce of wisdom, a dash of experience, and those moments would become priceless.

Also related in the cast: Wendy Riley (Mrs. Sowerberry) and Grace Riley (the World’s Cutest “Boy”).  And Caitlin Cartwright (Rose Seller/Old Lady/Ensemble) and Rachel Cartwright (Milk Maid/Seller/Ensemble).  I bet they’ll hold this forever.

With all the kids in the cast, you just know there were parents running around in all kinds of other helpful ways.  It looks like at least two different fathers of young cast members acted as Stage Manger (Rick Beiswenger, Alec Beiswenger’s Dad, and Gary Chapman, Sadee Chapman’s Dad).  As Emily puts it, many moms and dads contributed as “child wranglers” with Barbie Baldone (good name!) credited as the head Parent Wrangler (and the Mama of a well-cast Oliver: Gabe Baldone).

So it’s definitely a family.  The thing about theatre is – so I hear – that, even if you weren’t family going in, you are coming out.  Seeing this kind of warm and charismatic performance makes me want to be involved – and isn’t that the point?

Thanks to Sandi Nicholson, Regina Arnold, and the Leeds Arts Council for not locking the door when they heard I might be visiting.  “Please Sir, I want some more.”

The Sound of Music by Red Mountain Theatre Company

Monday, July 19th, 2010

“Oh, of course you sing.  Everybody sings!”

I don’t exactly know why, but I’m usually pretty tough on lead actors.  If a show has a main character (or two), I’m maybe a little unforgiving.  Maybe it’s just because those shoes can be awfully big to fill.  It’s an important job.  Some soar, some flop.  But “pretty good” just won’t do when you gotta be Stanley Kowalski.

The Sound of Music offers some of theatre’s biggest shoes to fill.  Everybody’s seen the movie.  Plus, Julie Andrews.  I mean really – Julie Flippin’ Andrews.  There’s pretty much no girl hotter than Mary Poppins, is there?  Or does saying that make me weird?

Kristen Bowden Sharp and the children - how can you not smile watching someone jump on the bed?

Kristen Bowden Sharp & Children - How can you not smile watching someone jump on the bed?

In the Red Mountain Theatre Company’s production of The Sound of Music, there’s no danger of me talking bad about Kristen Bowden Sharp.  (Especially since I think I might’ve sat next to her Daddy…)  I already complimented her as “attentive and attractive” in an earlier piece.  It’s always fun to see the same actor in different roles because you get to see which personality parts change and which parts don’t.  The great voice is still there.  Plus, she brought a innate grace, elegance, and sweetness to each role.  If you’d asked me beforehand, I mightn’t have thought those qualities would’ve worked for a Maria that I normally think of as childlike, insouciant, and guileless.  But they did.  If you’re stuck with casting actors who are just like the original, more-famous version, it gets a bit creepy – like only dating people who look suspiciously like your ex.

As a complete digression, I keep wondering if the name “Maria Rainer” – The Sound of Music’s lead character – has anything to do with the poet, Rainer Maria Rilke?  I truly have no idea.  Any help?

Back to the “tough on leads” thing, I’ve often thought that it might be hard to find truly masculine leading men for theatre.  Especially for musical theatre?  George Dvorsky, as Captain von Trapp, works.  He’s stoic and military at first.  Then you get to watch as he becomes more warm, expressive, and personable.  His first smile of the evening is truly lovely.  But he’s always a significantly male and paternal presence.  Maybe it helps that he’s about a foot taller than this Maria, but she looks like she’s happily tipping straight back when it’s time to be kissed.

Even with all the talent of these leads and the cuteness of the von Trapp children, I gotta say that “Sixteen Going on Seventeen” stole the show.  When I take seven pages of notes, I can tell I like a performance.  Or sometimes if I’m too engaged in the show to take any.  But here are my verbatim notes on this song: “Sixteen on 17 – Easily one of the most adorable things I’ve seen on stage.  Liesl is great.  Good dance, good expressions – minus the lifts, out of character.  Deliciously awkward.  Really great.  He’s good too.  Rolf???  *expressive, expressive*  If you can’t shake your head CUTE, you have no business in theatre.

Liesl is Katie Wesler – a fellow Shades Valley alumni – and she’s terrific.  Pretty, expressive, and she sings, dances, acts, and interacts.  Even her pink dress was excellent.  And Rolf’s performance (Collin Janich) is worth noting and provides a strong foundation.  Their number was great and reflected the wavering confidence and awkwardness of being thiser-teen going on thater-teen.  She’s great the rest of the show, too.

The von Trapp children are precocious and cute and they all have at least one moment.  A nice feature of the Red Mountain Theatre Company blog is a chance to read about these kids.

Finally, the show was at the Virginia Samford Theatre and I asked at halftime whether I could switch my seat and try out the balcony.  When I take someone new to the VST, they often ask “Who gets to sit up there?” or “What’s up there?”  It must be a common question.  And now I know.  It’s the Charles D. McCrary Patrons’ Balcony.  It’s every bit as chilly as I’d heard.  They keep the spotlights up there.  It’s only one row of seats.  But the chairs are much larger and softer than the cramped seats in the main theatre.  It’s really a whole different perspective and it’s different to be able to see right down into the orchestra pit.  You’re at about eye level with the rest of the lights.  And it’s cool to see all the pink and yellow tape all over the stage – completely invisible from the ground level.  If they could talk, I wonder what stories those tape marks would tell.  Almost makes me want to sell my truck and donate a couple thousand dollars.

Thanks to Nicole Smith, the Red Mountain Theatre Company, and Kim Dean Davenport (I think…) for admitting me.  This show was great in almost every way.  I still wish they’d prominently feature some photographs or video on the RMTC website.

Little Shop of Horrors (& Sanspointe Practice)

Friday, June 18th, 2010

“Believe it, baby.  It talks.”

The Magic City Actors Theatre is currently putting on a very good performance of Little Shop of Horrors.  And it made me figure out that I don’t know how to categorize a musical (or an opera, for that matter) on this blog.   It obviously fits in my “Birmingham” section.  And it’s obviously “Theatre”.  But can it also be “Music”?  Or do I have to reserve the category for things that are just music?  Then there’s my troublesome “Dance” category.  More on that in a minute.

There are different levels of music in theatre.  When the Park Players did Much Ado About Nothing, there was some singing.  And some dancing.  But I wouldn’t have classified it as “Music” or “Dance”.  But Little Shop of Horrors is a more straightforward musical.  So it was mostly singing, though there was some speaking.  And it had a five-piece orchestra.  So it has to count as “Music”, right?

Here’s the philosophical question: How much music can a play have before it becomes a musical?  Two songs?  Four?  Half and half?  Or does it have to be mostly music?  I don’t know.

And then, what if I broaden my definition of music?  I have absolutely no doubt that a charismatic, powerful, and persuasive speaking voice has strong musical and melodic overtones.  Actors know that.  When I watched auditions, I was forced to admit to being surprised at how essential a good voice is for an actor.  I’d think some study of singing – even if you’re not a “singer” – would be very helpful.  Even, perhaps, if you’re in some other career where you talk to people during part of your day.  It can’t hurt.

This Little Shop of Horrors cast offers several examples, but most notably, Kyle Holman as the dentist boyfriend is instantly brilliant and hilarious from the moment he appears onstage.  He also shines as several other smaller characters.  At least some part of his charisma comes from his vocal inflection and talent.  Direct from his bio: Kyle “is a full time Voice Actor and has been featured in numerous radio and TV commercials and video games . . . .”  Also, any production of Little Shop has to give the plant a personality, and one of the ways is to give it a big, memorable voice.

The Audrey II plant also has to move – which leads me to my next point.  Yes, they do some actual choreography and dancing in Little Shop of Horrors, but a big part of the plant’s character and personality comes from the puppetry and planning of its movement.  Making the mouth sync with the voice is part of the magic.  It’s also got to feel sinister.  This trick falls to Seymour (Edward “Dane” Peterson) when Audrey II is just a little bud, then to an actor/dancer inside the Audrey II (Dallas Taylor) once it gets bigger.

All of the other characters likewise have a distinct personality in their movement.  You could “mute” the whole show, watch it in pantomime, and I think it would still be pretty entertaining.  It’s got to be difficult for a seasoned performer/dancer to fill Seymour with such a sweet, nerdy clumsiness.  Audrey (Tawny Stephens) has a prissy, feminine, and gentle movement and a wiggly, staccato walk that I’d really like to teach to all my future girlfriends.  The urchins (Shekinah Lampkin, Cristi Strickland, and Ashley Guin) – spectacular as a group – are full of loose, streetwise attitude. Finally, the dentist moves in a way that you know he’s both unpredictable and full of menace.  Chaotic evil.

So here’s my trouble.  Since it’s got so much important, expressive movement, does this performance of Little Shop of Horrors qualify as “Dance”?  I don’t know.

So I’ll tie it into something else.  I got invited the other day to come watch Alabama School for the Fine Arts graduate Margi Cole work through some choreography with the Sanspointe Dance Company.  She established a few ground rules for the dancers and then let ‘em pretty much improvise their own movement, subject to editing and tinkering.  But even for something that’s pure dance, a lot of the fun comes from watching and discovering the character of a dancer – as expressed through their movement.

In other words, I think I could tell something about each dancer’s personality by watching them move.  Especially considering they created a lot of their own motion.  But I think you can still tell a lot about a dancer, even in something highly stylized like ballet.  Isn’t that the whole point of dance?  Expression – literally?  So when Sanspointe dancers move, they’re moving to express personality or emotion of some sort.  And when the Little Shop actors move, they’re also moving to express personality or emotion of some sort.  And when I’m doing the pimp roll down Fifth Avenue, the point is expression.

So why isn’t everything “Dance”?  It is, isn’t it?  Or – to flip it around – why isn’t dance an essential skill to learn (or to teach our children), once you start to think of it as expressing personality and emotion through movement?  It’s very important both to be able to move in a way that is an accurate reflection of yourself and also to be able to accurately read others’ movement.  I might put that up there with essential life skills.  At the very least, actors should study a little dance – and dancers could probably benefit from studying a little theatre.

So that’s that – everything’s dance.  And music.  And art.  But we gotta draw lines somewhere.

Thanks to Natalie Valentine and the Magic City Actors Theatre for putting on a “Birmingham”, “Music”, “Theatre” experience and to the Sanspointe Dance Company for giving me a “Birmingham”, “Dance” experience.

Joshua Bell with the Alabama Symphony Orchestra

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

Snopes: Claim: Violinist Joshua Bell played incognito in a Washington subway.  TRUE.

Gene Weingarten of the Washington Post won the Pulitzer for his role in setting up and writing about that stunt.  I highly recommend you read his article: Pearls Before Breakfast.  It’s probably the best newspaper story I’ve ever read.  It’s so good that I review it again every few months.  The video is here. Watching the woman stop – transfixed - from 1:36 may be as beautiful and magical as anything I’ve ever seen.  Something about that scene accurately captures a specific feeling.

Claim: Violinist Joshua Bell performed less-than-incognito on Saturday with the Alabama Symphony Orchestra.  TRUE.

I admit to not being a particularly big follower of orchestra or violin music and I admit that I didn’t know anything about Joshua Bell before I read that 2007 Post article.  But even before I heard him perform, I was a fan.  The guy is just cool.  I jumped at the chance to go.

Claim: Violinist Joshua Bell is terrible in live performances.  FALSE.

Bell did not disappoint.  I think the ASO flipped the program from how it was printed.  So first he covered Mendelssohn’s Concerto in E minor for Violin & Orchestra (1845).  I didn’t know anything about this piece, but Wikipedia says it is “regarded as one of the greatest violin concertos of all time . . . remains popular and has developed a reputation as an essential concerto for all aspiring concert violinists to master.”  This might be a YouTube link to that piece in another venue.  He also performed Ravel’s Tzigane (1924).  And there was an encore which I think was by Vieuxtemps (Variations on Yankee Doodle).  You can watch Bell perform it in another venue at this link.  The symphony orchestra also performed two pieces without Bell: Mendelssohn’s Hebrides (Fingal’s Cave) (1830) and Bizet’s Symphony No. 1 in C major (1855).

Claim: Bizet wrote this symphony at age 17.  TRUE.

Claim: Reading stuff like that makes me feel like I’ve wasted my life.  TRUE.

This may be a taboo question, but I wonder what responses I’d get if I asked other violinists what makes Joshua Bell so good?  Or what makes him better than any other violinist who was on stage?  By asking this question, I’m not trying to categorize or establish a pecking order.  I really would love an empirical answer as to why Joshua Bell is so good.  I don’t have the same insight that another violinist might have.  Is it technique?  Is he doing anything different?  More artistry?  Good looks?  Raw charisma?  Presentation and framing?  His Stradivarius?

Claim: That hunk of wood and strings is worth more than I’ll ever be worth in my lifetime all put together.  PROBABLY TRUE.

Because I write, I have at least some insight about what makes someone like Shakespeare better than me.  His use of the language is richer for sure.  His word combinations can be brilliant.  He understands human nature and illuminates it in a way that I cannot.  His fictional characters are often more alive than real people I know.  But still that’s not quite it, is it?  When I read Shakespeare, he’s just got that certain something that makes it good and enjoyable.  And it’s something that I have difficulty expressing in words.  It’s how he makes you feel.

Claim: It can be a physical and sensual experience to listen to music.  TRUE.

Lovers of classical music will talk about beauty.  And how fine art will appeal to higher senses.  But I’m a rock n roll guy.  I like a beat.  I want to feel the whatever-it-is that makes your hips move.  It’s at its best when you’re overwhelmed by the pulse and the rhythm.  I rarely anticipate that instrumental music might be the same kind of absorbing.  I don’t want music to be intellectual or mathy or heady – I’m attracted to the raw and visceral.  Great art sweats.

After Saturday, though, I’m convinced of two things.  First, listening to symphony music through speakers is to being there in person like eating a hot dog is to petting a pig.

Claim: WBHM : ASO :: Eating Frank : Petting Wilbur.  TRUE.

Second, and very importantly, I realized that this kind of music can trigger just as much of a physical response as a good vocal, guitar, bass, and drums.  Not emotional.  Physical.  It’s just that its a different response.   Much more delicate.  There were moments – even individual notes – where I realized I was holding my breath.  Like when you’re anticipating a shared first kiss, but pull up just short.  There were moments of elevation – I don’t have another word – where I tensed.  Like a light touch on your stomach from someone completely new.  At other moments, I almost couldn’t help but quietly give an audible sigh (ohh) at being held.

Claim: There were whole rows of empty seats available at the Alys Stephens Center for this performance.  TRUE.

This was an outstanding performance.  More people should have seen it.  It borders on criminal that there were empty rows.  If a group like the ASO puts together a good product, someone should make sure people are there to appreciate it.  It looks miserly or wasteful not to put warm bodies in those seats.

Should our local media outlets do a better job at promoting shows that are likely to be unique or amazing?  Should the ASO brainstorm more ways to spread the word?  Should Birmingham have more appreciation for this kind of event?  Should tickets be available for something less than $50?  Could the ASO have given extra tickets to schools or teachers or nonprofits or other deserving groups?  Could a small number of tickets (the four back balcony rows?) be reserved and available ten minutes before performances to anyone under 30 at half-price, first-come first-serve?  Should organizations understand that it doesn’t cost anything to give unused tickets away if you’ve already paid to put on the show?  Would that be a good way to build repeat business and invest in public relations?

Thanks to Curtis Long, Marie Sutton, Monica Dent and the rest of the Alabama Symphony Orchestra for offering me a ticket.

Dane Peterson’s Theatre Series Presents Grey Gardens

Monday, May 10th, 2010

Theatre might should be marked with a “degree of difficulty” rating.

In some sports (the ones that maybe really aren’t sports), the way they get judged is to rate how hard something is and then score participants based on how well they did it.  For example, in diving, a tuck reverse double somersault from a one meter springboard is a “2.3″.  That’s almost meaningless to me, too, but that’s just what divers do.  For a high jump, you just set the bar, measure, and see whether you cleared it.  Because high jump is a sport.  Unlike ice skating or cheerleading.

Similarly, some things in theatre are more difficult than others.  Putting on Equus is maybe harder than Driving Miss Daisy.  I’m not saying that it’s easy to put on any particular show.  Getting the people together and moving in the right direction is always an amazing and laudable effort.  But I think some shows have a higher “degree of difficulty” to perform and perform well.  Put another way, some shows carry a higher risk of failure or leaving an audience unsatisfied.

To break it into parts, there can also be individual, discrete pieces of theatre that are more difficult for performers.  Certain songs are just plain hard to sing.  Certain lines are hard on the tongue.  Certain characters are difficult to get right.  Certain moments or emotions may be tough to convey.  Maybe the beautiful dress the Costume Coordinator made for you makes it impossible to dance and sing.

While watching the musical Grey Gardens – as presented by Dane Peterson’s Theatre Series – I couldn’t help but think how difficult it seemed.  Whereas I believe likability and charisma are the most important assets for a performer – whether you’re playing good or evil – these characters seemed to have been written as mostly unsympathetic.  This kind of writing asks a lot of your actors.  If your character is kind-of a jerk, you’d better be a very likable jerk.  To this day, I can’t explain the popularity of Seinfeld.  Although I have to say that Leah Luker’s performance as “Little” Edie Beale often gave me reasons to pull for the character and Carole Armistead as Edith Bouvier Beale had the likability thing down pat.  Though he plays a rascal, I also liked Brad Simmons as George Gould Strong and I especially liked his voice.

I’m no expert, but it seemed like many (or most) of the songs in Grey Gardens were written to be flat-out hard.  This is part of the “degree of difficulty” I’m talking about.  I understand that these kinds of songs can take a lot of mental energy for a performer.  And that it takes substantial work to get the technical details right.  But this doesn’t free anyone from a responsibility to act.

I’m not usually wowed purely by masterful technique.  In the world of musical theatre, I generally want to find a groove where the performers don’t seem like they’re performing at all.  Any singing should mostly feel like a seamless part of the character.  No matter how gifted your voice, in musical theatre you shouldn’t forget the theatre part.  No one is allowed to ignore other actors while they flirt with and sing to the audience.

Thanks to Dane Peterson for working hard to bring a difficult and unusual musical to the Birmingham stage.