Theatre

...now browsing by category

 

Opera Birmingham: Figaro Rehearsal Redux

Monday, March 15th, 2010

The Most Famous First Page of Any Score in All of Opera?

A lady named Hermione Lee says that all marriages are inexplicable.  Yeah, and a guy named Harold Bloom goes on to say that Shakespeare taught us the black box theory of marriage.  We never know why we married, why marriage did or didn’t work, and, after it crashes, we can’t recover the black box.

Such is love.

There were twenty or more singers at the Opera Birmingham rehearsal for The Marriage of Figaro on Saturday.  And just about the first thing I noticed was – when the singers weren’t actually singing – how “over it” many of them seemed to be.  During this all-afternoon run-through – which is admittedly work for them – there were lots of times when singers were off to the side, “off stage”, waiting around for the moments when they got to perform, looking a little bored, typing on laptops, i-tech, and cellphones.  Or maybe just snoozing.  I thought, “Do they not like this?”

So I’m there for the whole afternoon to watch from the sidelines and – of course – I’m spellbound by the whole thing.  Even with no costumes, no sets, no orchestra, and few real props, it’s a terrific performance.  Not just the singing and performance details, but just the spectacle. In contrast to what I thought about the singers, I could barely take my ears off it.  And I wondered how it would be possible to sit in that room and not pay attention.

But after sitting there a while and watching the performances, I’m certain my first impression of those singers was wrong.  It’s kind-of like something I’ve occasionally called The Bob Dylan Effect: What would it be like to be married to a genius?  Someone who could be effortlessly new all the time?

For example, let’s say I somehow wrangle a date with Regina Spektor.  I’ll admit that I’d probably get a bit nervous.  In fact, I’d probably be in awe, just on general principles, and then even more amazed that she somehow liked me back.  Shoot, let’s be honest, I’m amazed when anybody likes me back.  Let’s say – just in bizarro world – that I manage to marry Miss Spektor.  (As long as I’m dreaming, I’d like a pony.)  How long could it last that I could sit around and listen to her singing and tinkering around at the piano, before I got up and needed to do something else?  Would I listen less as years went by?

Like Billy Crystal says in When Harry Met Sally, “You take someone to the airport, it’s clearly the beginning of the relationship.  That’s why I have never taken anyone to the airport at the beginning of a relationship.  Because eventually things move on and you don’t take someone to the airport and I never wanted anyone to say to me: How come you never take me to the airport anymore?”

Put another way, I’ve been lucky to date a few truly beautiful girls and found that – directly contrary to what I thought would happen when I was fourteen – after a while, I start paying attention to her as something entirely more than just beautiful.  In fact, I can almost forget the beautiful part.  Until we’re at the grocery store and she walks back an aisle to get some salad dressing or something and I get absorbed in some other thing until I happen to look up and see this beautiful girl from a hundred feet away and having just an instant to wonder “holyCOWwhoisthat?!?” before realizing that it’s my girlfriend and it makes me amazed all over again that such a beautiful girl could think it was cool to hang out with me.

Or maybe, when you date someone, you tend to stay pretty close to her when you’re out and you don’t get enough chances to appreciate her from ten feet away, or a hundred feet away, or the next table over at a restaurant, or to just stare at the back of her head like we all used to do in school.  Those perspectives are mainly for the people outside your relationship.  Those people who can still see her and be spellbound by how beautiful she is.  But you’ve traded those perspectives for a closer and more complex view.

Back to those opera singers . . . they’re inside the relationship.  At some point, they met the opera and they were spellbound because she was so beautiful.  And they asked her out.  One date became two, two became three, and the blink-of-an-eye later, they were studying and training and singing – pressed right up close and in a relationship with this beautiful thing.

When I was fourteen, I misjudged marriage too.  I read Romeo and Juliet, looked around at adults, and thought, “How is it all so routine?  Where’s the passion?”  But it’s there.  You don’t commit to a relationship – or spend your Saturday afternoons at practice – without a good bit of passion.  And love.  And comfortable, well-worn, mutual respect after years of wrestling around with each another.  Relationships are full of nuance.

On the other hand: “Genius, and not marriage, is my subject, and the age-old advice not to marry a genius probably is sound enough.”

Thanks again to Daniel Seigel and Opera Birmingham for letting me watch another Opera Birmingham rehearsal.

Opera Birmingham: Practice for The Marriage of Figaro

Monday, March 8th, 2010

I enthusiastically accepted when Opera Birmingham invited me to come watch a practice.  If it’s not already on your calendar, take note that they’re preparing to perform The Marriage of Figaro in a couple of weeks.  On both lists of “Best Operas” that I could find quickly (here and here), Figaro ranks in the top five.  For that reason alone, you probably should make a point to go in person and see it performed.  Go ahead and ask yourself: When’s your next opportunity to see a “Top Five” anything in Birmingham, Alabama?

I visited opera rehearsal in the context of just finishing my RPM Challenge album for 2010.  If you’re an opera fan and reading this piece, then you’ll have absolutely no business whatsoever thinking about or listening to my completely amateur musical and singing efforts.  All you really need to know is that RPM challenges musicians to write and record a whole album of music all in the short month of February.  So the time between the creative idea and the realization of that idea is extremely (and perhaps excessively) short – just 28 days.  Which allows precious little time for contemplation or technical mastery.  You just rush to get in, get it done, and get out.

I speak from experience when I can tell you, even in a rush and with simple ideas and limited time, that the original inspiration always gets altered in translation.  There are chord changes, lyrics, or ideas that just don’t fit.  So they get taken out or changed.  The finished product is at least a few left turns and veers removed from how it was envisioned that first week in February.

The flip side of the always-rushing-around coin would be something like The Marriage of Figaro.  Mr. Mozart did his part for Figaro in the 1780s.  That allows over two-hundred years between that particular genius idea and Opera Birmingham’s particular realization of that idea.  It’s a pretty short list of works of art that regularly get performed two hundred years later.

The bad news is that Figaro’s expression is complexicated because – not only is Mozart’s idea as old as our country (and my-oh-my how times have changed) – it’s written in Italian.  It also requires independent interpretation from a full cast of more than twenty singers, an orchestra, a conductor, and a director.  Inevitably, stuff gets edited, pushed, pulled, and altered.  The good news is that artsy, creative, and scholarly people have had over two hundred years to ponder those changes.  And the performers have spent a lifetime on the details of technical mastery.

When something like Shakespeare’s plays, Bach’s fugues, or The Marriage of Figaro are performed, they stagger through your door with these generations of interpretational baggage.  This contrasts with more modern entertainment.  With movies, for example, you can often walk in unprepared and they’ll make a good faith and self-contained effort to explain it all to you.  With that in mind, it’s my belief that every scrap you can learn about works like Figaro – before you go – will pay you back in spades.  But don’t feel bad if you don’t know much about opera.  Just like it was said at the rehearsal, “Remember, probably thirty to forty percent of this audience will have never seen opera before.”  (I’ve only seen one.)

It’s not like you have to do anything highfalootin’ like study.  Take this tidbit for example: Alabama native Susanna Phillips – who is cast as Countess Almaviva – wore her grandfather’s cowboy boots to practice.  Isn’t that cool?  Overheard there: “It’s not often you see a soprano in cowboy boots.”  Do you like her more?  I do.  Will you visualize her in orangey-brown, broken-in boots even when you see her all “divaed up” on stage?  I might.

Howabout this info: Apparently, The Marriage of Figaro is significantly fast for an opera.  Though some others can stretch like five sentences of content into twelve minutes of singing, Figaro apparently requires a nimble tongue, a sense of timing, and some judicious editing of the audience’s titles.  Like a a highly revved engine.  Or an Italian and musical version of the Gilmore Girls.  When you go, doesn’t that make you want to pay attention to the sheer speed?  It does me.  Will you be sensitive and listen for cast members that might miss lines or sing them over one another?  I will.

Finally, back in the 18th century there weren’t any trailers, like for movies.  So I’d imagine that an audience would find some other way of learning the general story before they went to see the show.  Why not take a look at a synopsis (like here) and get an overview even before you get there?  Let yourself concentrate on other things, like just how lovely the music can be.  Even at practice, it was.

Thanks very much to Daniel Seigel and Opera Birmingham for this cool opportunity.  My favorite random line of the day: “I’d pay real money to see Juilliard play Birmingham Southern in football.”

Equus by Theatre Downtown

Friday, February 19th, 2010

When Equus leaves – if he leaves at all – it will be with your intestines in his teeth.

In the same way that there are some people who don’t like to ride roller coasters, there must be people who won’t enjoy art that’s likely to grab at your throat and give you a rush.  Yes, there’s always a time and place for mindless or bubblegum entertainment – Lord knows, there were whole months when I watched Telemundo without knowing any Spanish – but everyone should allow themselves at least an occasional opportunity to see something potentially transcendent.

That’s why I love Equus.  I read the script back in college and it completely transformed my perspective.  Because of this power, it has survived for more than 35 years and become a modern classic.  What must it be like to try and play roles made famous in part by Anthony Hopkins and Daniel Radcliffe?  How much fun must it be to strap on a mask and become one of the six on-stage horses?  What’s it like to wake up in the morning and realize that tonight – and tomorrow night – you’re going to be completely naked in front of a roomful of strangers?

In this Theatre Downtown production, Tim Childers delivers in almost every scene as a disturbingly intense and rapt teenager; his Alan Strang is every bit the modern kin to Malcolm McDowell’s Alex in A Clockwork Orange.  Ginny S. Loggins is excellent as the concerned magistrate and gives her character a clear inside-warm and outside-tough.  Mel Christian provides several first-rate moments as Alan’s mother, using both her infectious laughter and her sincere, overwrought motherhood.  David Phipps and Christina Guthrie are also notably well-cast as Alan’s father and (human) love-interest.  Full credit to the director, J.J. Marrs, for realizing his own vision of this difficult piece.

Equus is an experience, and I could write about it for pages and pages.  Instead, I’ll just tell a quick story.  I remember seeing a Rhodes College production of Equus back when I lived in Memphis and there were three cute coeds sitting in front of me for that performance.  I talked to them at intermission, of course.  (Another great reason for guys to go see plays.)  But I was so disappointed when they told me they were just there for extra credit.  In fact, they were shocked that I might want to be there for any other reason.  And some people won’t ever appreciate roller coasters, I guess.

I’d like to encourage other organizations around Birmingham to follow Theatre Downtown’s example and offer something like a Thursday “Hobo Night” – where you’re allowed to pay what you can afford.  This practice encourages students and non-corporate types to come out to the show, which may help build a citywide love of the arts.  But if you think hobnobbing with students and non-corporate types will make you smell funny, you can just come on regular nights.

Finally, if you see Equus – and I absolutely recommend it – be aware that it earns its R-rating for nakedness, sexuality, and violence.  Don’t say that no one warned you.  Although it’s always fun to witness firsthand the dropped jaws and shocked gasps from those in the audience who weren’t forewarned.

I can hear the creature’s voice.  It’s calling me out of the black cave of the Psyche.  I shove in my dim little torch, and there he stands – waiting for me.  He raises his matted head.  He opens his great square teeth, and says – Why? . . . Why Me? . . . Why – ultimately – Me? . . . Do you really imagine you can account for Me?  Totally, infallibly, inevitably account for Me?

Thanks to Billy Ray Brewton, J.J. Marrs, and Scarlett Bradford for welcoming me to their show.

Theatre UAB: Joe Turner’s Come and Gone

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

After our beautiful snow, I went and saw Theatre UAB’s production of Joe Turner’s Come and Gone.  I’m not sure I loved the play, but Crystal Lee was often a standout as (a female version of) Bynum Walker.  It may have been worth it just for her monologue about the incredible depth of women.  Also, I think pretty much the whole audience recognized the incredible cuteness and charisma of young Colby Holman as Reuben Mercer.  Another plus, Theatre UAB is consistently masterful with their set designs.

The play is hugely funny in places and in a lot of different ways.  It’s jokey funny and weird funny and shockingly uncomfortably funny.  And UAB productions always draw a diverse crowd, so it’s really fun to listen to those diverse reactions.

I laughed at stuff that no one else did.  Other times, people around me laughed and I had no idea why.  We even changed from the floor to the balcony between acts in part to get to listen to some different people.  (When you go to live performances, I reiterate my belief that the crowd is a big part of the show…)  Was I just not looking in the right place at the right time?  Was I focused on a different part of the stage?  Not paying enough attention?  Do I have a different (or unusual) sense of humor?

Benoit Johnson and Crystal Lee

Benoit Johnson and Crystal Lee

One of my favorite things about theatre is inappropriate or unexpected laughter from the crowd.  Many things happen in Joe Turner that are strange left turns.  Lots of sudden and unexpected sexual innuendo and overtures.  Someone will blurt out, “Oh my goodness.”  Someone will gasp.  Someone will chortle.  And sometimes I agree – you’ve just got to let it all out.

My theory on this – partly – is that theatre lets you look at whatever you want.  With a big stage, your focus will be wandering to the left when the action is to the right and, sometimes, you’ll be rewarded with a laugh.  Sometimes you’ll be watching what everybody else is, and sometimes you won’t.  Actors: there’s no time to relax.

The back half of my theory is that our diverse backgrounds nurture and grow different kinds of humor.  (Which may be a curious problem, since the first thing on most people’s list of good things in a mate is inevitably “sense of humor” – whatever that might mean to them.)  Some people can’t appreciate broad, slapstick humor.  Some can’t appreciate technical wordplay.  Some people won’t laugh at subtle glances or sarcastic facial expressions.  And I think some actors tend towards one end or the other of this spectrum – good for some parts and groups, bad for others.

In related news, congratulations to Daniel Martin, Emily Parks, and the other UAB students who did well at their regional competition.

Thanks again to Melissa Christian and Shannon Thomason for letting me barter admission to the show.

The Laramie Project

Friday, February 12th, 2010

We are all word-borrowers.

It’s why I’ve had conversations with men – more than once – that involved pretty much nothing but Caddyshack jokes.  It’s why I was recently asked which movies I could quote all the way through.  It’s why everybody understands what’s going on when you make somebody “an offer he can’t refuse.” It’s also why we often struggle with words in new situations or after significant events.

How’d you know what to say when your best friend got engaged?  When you found out she was uh-oh pregnant?  What about when your Mom’s Mom died?

We don’t typically make it up on the spot.  Chances are, you mostly borrow, pattern, and patch together your conversations out of other things you’ve seen and heard in similar situations.  You are what you eat.  Although the human storytelling impulse goes back ages, it’s fairly easy to imagine a time when you would have been forced to draw only on personal experience.

But a primary function of the dramatic arts is to gift us with borrowable words.  Homer provided the Odyssey, which allowed us to compare events in our own lives to events in a hero’s journey.  Teenagers toss out Romeo and Juliet to express and understand new feelings like “parting is such sweet sorrow.” And anybody with the skills to read this blog has probably already heard or used “Candy Mountain, Charlie…  We’re going to Candy Mountain” in a conversation.

Unprecedented events can leave us speechless.  I remember watching Tom Hanks reunited with Helen Hunt, his wife in Cast Away, after spending years alone on a tiny island and – although I can’t remember whether they said it in the movie or I said it out loud at the time – saying that those kind of moments simply have no script.  We’ve all had that thought: what do I say here?

Who had any idea what to say in the days and weeks following 9/11 – until someone told us it was okay to be in heavy boots?

Likewise, no one in Laramie, Wyoming – or the rest of the country – knew what to say about the murder of Matthew Shepard.  What do you say if you’re a resident of Laramie or Wyoming or America?  If you’re heterosexual or gay or lesbian?  If you’re a student or teacher – parent or child?  If you’re Catholic or Mormon or Protestant or Atheist?  If you’re Republican or Democrat?

There were no coherent words.  Even Rulon Stacey, the otherwise rational hospital spokesman who announced Shepard’s death – the first public attempt at searching for the right words – was moved to tears and “lost it” on national television.

That’s one reason The Laramie Project is important.  Following that event, there was a search for the right reaction, the right feelings, and the right things to say.  Along with a crush of media, a small group of East Coast dramatists travelled to Laramie to collect information and interviews about the area, the murder, and the aftermath while it was all still fresh and evolving.  Their play is a chronological, honest, and multifaceted retelling of that group’s experiences.  It’s an unusual piece, in that it transparently shows its work, and shows us the process of how we collectively find and create our responses to unprecedented situations.

For a play about a hate crime, this Magic City Actors Theatre production is highly engaging, entertaining, and not oppressively dark.  This whole cast is remarkably good: Beth Ashton, Jill Casey, Howard Green, Amy E. Johnson, Stephen Mangina, Franklin Slaton, B.J. Underwood, and Hannah Wilkerson.  I also credit the Directors: Michael Stephens and Tawny Stephens.  I highly recommend it.

My only complaint would be small and not particular to this show.  When a play ends, there’s a responsibility to signal to your audience – clearly and unmistakably – that it’s over.  We like your show.  We want to show you.  We are ready.  A curtain should snap shut or the lights should fall, quickly and completely, so that our energy and enthusiasm can be fully released as applause.  For every unclear moment we wonder, “Is it over?  Is there more?” that energy gets diverted.  Unless there’s a reason to blur the lines between the real and slumber’d worlds, end confidently; allow your performers and audience their fullest possible ovation.

Thanks to Hannah Wilkerson and Leah Faulkner for letting me see the show.